• About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Fund Fluxes
Advertisement
  • Business
  • investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
No Result
View All Result
  • Business
  • investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
No Result
View All Result
Fund Fluxes
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Bondi ‘hate speech’ remarks spark torrent of criticism from conservatives

September 17, 2025
in Politics
0
Bondi ‘hate speech’ remarks spark torrent of criticism from conservatives
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi faced a torrent of criticism online Tuesday after she suggested in two separate interviews that the Justice Department would ‘absolutely target’ hate speech in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s shooting death — sparking intense backlash from Republicans and other conservatives and prompting her to further clarify her remarks.

Bondi attempted to bridge the divide between her remarks and what she called hate speech that leads to threats in a lengthy social media post Tuesday.

‘Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment,’ Bondi said, citing three U.S. laws that criminalize threats of direct violence, such as threats of kidnapping or injury. ‘It’s a crime.’ 

‘For far too long, we’ve watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations, and cheer on political violence. That era is over,’ she said, adding that ‘free speech protects ideas, debate, even dissent but it does NOT and will NEVER protect violence.’

Bondi’s remarks, made during a ‘The Katie Miller Podcast’ interview and in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity during conversations about the fatal shooting of Kirk, prompted backlash across the aisle, though it was conservative voices who were the loudest. Many noted that Kirk, the Turning Point USA founder and subject of the interviews, was himself a vociferous defender of free speech protections under the First Amendment, which protects most forms of speech in the U.S., including offensive and hateful speech.

Many also appeared to view the new statement as insufficient cover for Bondi’s previous remarks. 

‘This isn’t a correction or a retraction or a retreat; it’s a post hoc attempt to bend the term ‘hate speech’ to mean something that it never has,’ Charles C.W. Cooke, a senior editor at the National Review, said on social media.

Nearly 24 hours after Bondi’s remarks, the criticism has continued — nearly all of it from Republicans and other notable conservative voices.

Bondi came under fire for the two interviews Monday, neither of which distinguished the type of speech that threatened imminent violence from hate speech.

 ‘There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech,’ Bondi said Monday in an interview with former Trump administration aide and podcast host Katie Miller.

.’We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech,’ Bondi said.

In a separate interview on Fox News, Bondi reiterated a similar sentiment, suggesting that the government could prosecute Office Depot after an employee reportedly refused to print posters with Kirk’s face on them.

She said further that the department was ‘looking at’ the Office Depot case in question.

‘Businesses cannot discriminate,’ Bondi said on Fox News. ‘If you want to go in and print posters with Charlie’s pictures on them for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that.’

‘I have Harmeet Dhillon right now in our Civil Rights unit looking at that immediately, that Office Depot had done that,’ she said of the Office Depot employee in question. ‘We’re looking it up,’ she said.

Most of the criticism that poured in Tuesday was from Republicans, who noted that Bondi’s remarks are a flagrant violation of free speech protections guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.

They are also, some noted, directly at odds with the views famously espoused by Kirk.

‘Hate speech’ is a hopelessly subjective term, and even if it weren’t, there is no hate-speech exception to the First Amendment,’ said Ed Whelan, a conservative legal expert who formerly clerked for the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

‘I’m sorry, but this is the sort of leftwing progressivism that conservatives, including Charlie Kirk, abhorred,’ Erick Erickson said on X. ‘We stand with Jack Philips, not against him.’

Asked by ABC News’s Jon Karl to respond to Bondi’s remarks on Tuesday, Trump declined to clarify, and instead floated the idea of going after Karl’s outlet, albeit in a joking tone.

‘We’ll probably go after people like you, because you treat me so unfairly,’ Trump said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Previous Post

Hakeem Jeffries’ 4-word answer to why he skipped Charlie Kirk vigil

Next Post

FBI phone extractions, DNA testimony headline Day 7 of Ryan Routh trial

Next Post
FBI phone extractions, DNA testimony headline Day 7 of Ryan Routh trial

FBI phone extractions, DNA testimony headline Day 7 of Ryan Routh trial

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent News

    The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    November 6, 2025
    S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    November 6, 2025
    Trump says election results not good for Republicans, citing 2 possible reasons

    Trump says election results not good for Republicans, citing 2 possible reasons

    November 6, 2025
    House Dem crashes Mike Johnson press event as tensions erupt over shutdown

    House Dem crashes Mike Johnson press event as tensions erupt over shutdown

    November 6, 2025

    Disclaimer: fundfluxes.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.



    Copyright © 2024 fundfluxes.com | All Rights Reserved

    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Recent News

    The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    November 6, 2025
    S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    November 6, 2025
    Trump says election results not good for Republicans, citing 2 possible reasons

    Trump says election results not good for Republicans, citing 2 possible reasons

    November 6, 2025
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Business
    • investing
    • Politics
    • Stocks

    Copyright © 2024 pinnacleofinvestment.com | All Rights Reserved